

Discover more from How Not to F*ck Up Your Face
Welcome readers, old and new. Now’s your last chance to take advantage of HTFUYF’s birthday sale, which ends today, April 11, and offers a yearly subscription for $40 rather than the usual $50. I refuse branding opportunities to ensure these posts are unbiased and reported without obligation—so I rely on you for financial support. Thousands are reading HNTFUYF every single week. If you find the advice here helpful and you can swing it, today’s a good time to become a paid subscriber. Thank you!
And please remember to hit the ❤️ button above if you like what you read. It activates a flashing green light at the intersection of love and appearance, unlocking full access to self-appreciation everywhere.
Brief confession: With a steady influx of new readers, a battle has been waging lately at HNTFUYF between a service journalism angel sitting on my right shoulder and an ego devil on my left. The devil goads, How do I get even more readers? And more? The angel whispers, Intention to be helpful, first! F*ck the ego. (It’s a salty angel.) I’m bringing this up because of a recent reader response.
Said reader happens to be a loving person. Though she’s a stranger to me, I know this because at the end of her email detailing her disappointment with HNTFUYF, she signed off with, “Love to you and thank you for understanding my perspective.”
As a person who’s found satisfaction (maybe even happiness) after a facelift, she felt unsupported by the atmosphere at HNTFUYF. She wrote, “It feels more like if you aren't happy with aging gracefully in non-surgical ways, then [HNTFUYF] just isn’t for you. I find myself in a place in my life where I thought my face needed a bit of a lift to let me feel like it matched how I felt overall. I work so hard to keep myself healthy mentally and physically and my decision for a procedure was an easy one.” To which I say, good for you!
Her email followed another in which a reader shared that she was deeply offended by the fact that HNTFUYF allowed that filler might even be considered an option for some women. How misogynistic could I get?
You see the dilemma.
But both criticisms are helpful. More readers means many more and many different ideas about what aesthetic choices are “right” or “appropriate.”
I maintain that the “right” choice for you is the one you’re happiest with, whether it’s eschewing any and all treatments or electing to have surgery. I could probably do a better job of expressing that, so anyone can feel comfortable hanging out in our yard.
And about that phrase “aging gracefully?” I think it’s often used in a way that presents another difficult objective as we endure the challenges of getting older. No matter what aesthetic choices you make, you must look good—you must embrace (a word I used to love and now yeesh) your changing face and body. But if your goal is to live gracefully—with presence, intention, and compassion—what does aging have to do with it? As my five-year-old granddaughter likes to say, “Nuffing.” I’ll focus on aging gratefully, thanks.
A friend recently suggested I look at an article in the New York Times that was, he said, about how to get beautiful skin. Having missed the story, I looked it up. It was about the makeup artist Gucci Westman’s new skincare line.
The title “In Pursuit of Luminous Skin” made me think it was about how one might achieve that—but the story was bottom-line an advertisement for Westman’s products. This, as you may know, is what passes for beauty “journalism” and IMHO it sucks (no offense to the writer). Not because there’s anything wrong with writing about a popular makeup artist’s new skincare line, but because the story is packaged in such a way as to encourage you to believe it’s more than an ad, which it is not. And because it’s in the New York Times, you might want to believe that a reporter has at least researched the ingredients in the skincare line and ascertained their probable effectiveness—but nope. Westman is beautiful. Her products are beautiful. But buying her products will not make you beautiful.
Another friend sent me a story from Vanity Fair Australia with this gratifying headline: “Justine Bateman Explains Decision to Age Naturally: ‘I Just Don't Give a Shit.’” I do wonder about the idea of “aging naturally.” Does that mean you’re aging “unnaturally” if you’re inclined to avail yourself of aesthetic interventions? I expect each of you would have a different answer to that question. Feel free to add your voice to the comments!
Did you know the science/speculative fiction writer Ursula K. Le Guin also had wise thoughts about beauty? I’ve mentioned her before but here’s more:
There’s the ideal beauty of youth and health, which never really changes, and is always true. There’s the ideal beauty of movie stars and advertising models, the beauty-game ideal, which changes its rules all the time and from place to place, and is never entirely true. And there’s an ideal beauty that is harder to define or understand, because it occurs not just in the body but where the body and the spirit meet and define each other.
That must be what the great artists see and paint. That must be why the tired, aged faces in Rembrandt’s portraits give us such delight: they show us beauty not skin-deep but life-deep.
“Life-deep beauty.” Now, there’s a phrase I wish we could all get behind.
A Moment of Personal Horn-Blowing
HNTFUYF was recently included in a roundup of the “23 Best Health and Wellness Newsletters of 2023” by the (what else?) health and wellness website Ness. Thanks, Ness, and thanks to all you HNTFUYF-ers for inspiring me with your thoughtful questions and comments. xo
HNTFUYF, a Payola-Free Zone
Readers, a few of you have asked if I get a cut from sales when I mention a product. I do not. I only mention products I’d like to buy myself, and therefore think you might like, too. I share this so you know my recommendations are offered without obligation.
Val Asks You
Don’t be shy! What’s your most vexing or intractable appearance issue? Send your beauty-related questions to valeriemonroe@substack.com. If I don’t have a good answer, I’ll find someone who does.
I Call BS on "Aging Gracefully"
You love us all, Val Monroe, filled, botoxed, lifted, lasered, sewn, or untouched. You see through our looks straight into our hearts, our minds, and our uteruses!
I feel this whole thing of ‘aging gracefully’ - ‘Sniff. It’s outrageous she’s had work done!’(which, incidentally I never hear applied to men 😡) and ‘we should go grey naturally’ - ‘Sniff. Dyeing her hair is so FAKE’ is just women pitting against one another. Again. Like, ‘She works. Sniff. Her poor children, brought up by a nanny and ‘She stays home with her kids and doesn’t go out to work. Sniff. She must be as dumb as dog****’. So much judging. We need to be well informed, which I think you contribute to, Val - facts. Not get sucked in, but make informed decisions. And respect other’s decisions. I’ll bet most women know when they’ve gone too far. That’s ok. It doesn’t last forever! And I’ll bet many women look in the mirror, like your reader, and say ‘now I look how I feel’. Let’s go in with our eyes (not necessarily our wallets!) wide open. But your decision is just that. Yours. Wouldn’t it be nice if, when a woman who is complimented on how good she looks, could turn around and say ‘well, thank you, I’ve just had this amazing cosmetic procedure and I’m very happy with the results!’ I enjoy reading your recommendations and non-recommendations, Val. Keep it up! Kind regards, Kathryn (Australia)